OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series and related variants hold a commanding lead on LiveBench Mathematics, posting subcategory scores near 96% that exceed current Claude and other frontier models by clear margins on the live, contamination-resistant benchmark. Recent model releases and high-effort inference modes have reinforced trader consensus around OpenAI's edge in mathematical reasoning capabilities. With resolution just weeks away, this 91% implied probability reflects sustained benchmark dominance rather than speculation. A late-August model update or capability jump from Anthropic, or shifts in LiveBench's rotating math questions, represent the primary realistic paths that could narrow the gap before final scoring.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedOpenAI 91%
Anthropic 7%
Thinky <1%
Meta <1%
$17,300 Vol.
$17,300 Vol.

OpenAI
91%

Anthropic
7%

Thinky
<1%

Meta
<1%

<1%

Moonshot
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Nvidia
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Tencent
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Amazon
<1%

MiniMax
<1%
OpenAI 91%
Anthropic 7%
Thinky <1%
Meta <1%
$17,300 Vol.
$17,300 Vol.

OpenAI
91%

Anthropic
7%

Thinky
<1%

Meta
<1%

<1%

Moonshot
<1%

ByteDance
<1%

Nvidia
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Tencent
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Microsoft
<1%

Alibaba
<1%

Baidu
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

Xiaomi
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

DeepSeek
<1%

Amazon
<1%

MiniMax
<1%
Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Market Opened: Jul 29, 2026, 6:27 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=MathematicsResolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Resolution Source
https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=MathematicsResolver
0x69c47De9D...OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series and related variants hold a commanding lead on LiveBench Mathematics, posting subcategory scores near 96% that exceed current Claude and other frontier models by clear margins on the live, contamination-resistant benchmark. Recent model releases and high-effort inference modes have reinforced trader consensus around OpenAI's edge in mathematical reasoning capabilities. With resolution just weeks away, this 91% implied probability reflects sustained benchmark dominance rather than speculation. A late-August model update or capability jump from Anthropic, or shifts in LiveBench's rotating math questions, represent the primary realistic paths that could narrow the gap before final scoring.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions