Ongoing Russian advances in eastern Ukraine, combined with Moscow's insistence on full control of the Donetsk region as a precondition for any ceasefire, have kept formal negotiations on a deep pause since early 2026. Kremlin statements confirm continued military operations while rejecting compromise proposals from Kyiv and Western mediators, and recent Ukrainian comments indicate only possible technical discussions ahead without expectations of rapid progress. Intensified strikes on both sides further underscore the absence of de-escalation momentum. With roughly two months until October 31, these entrenched territorial disputes and frontline realities drive the market's strong consensus against a signed deal. A sudden shift in U.S. mediation pressure, major battlefield reversals, or external developments altering Russian incentives remain the primary variables that could still influence the timeline.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated4% chance
NEW
NEW
Oct 31, 2026
4% chance
NEW
NEW
Oct 31, 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Ukraine signs any written instrument (e.g., treaty, ceasefire/armistice, framework/“roadmap,” exchange of letters, or mediated agreement text) that: (i) includes both Ukraine and the Russian Federation as parties, and (ii) either ends hostilities/establishes a ceasefire or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war (i.e., stated objective of peace/normalization plus principles, steps, and/or a timetable) by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting. Ongoing Russian advances in eastern Ukraine, combined with Moscow's insistence on full control of the Donetsk region as a precondition for any ceasefire, have kept formal negotiations on a deep pause since early 2026. Kremlin statements confirm continued military operations while rejecting compromise proposals from Kyiv and Western mediators, and recent Ukrainian comments indicate only possible technical discussions ahead without expectations of rapid progress. Intensified strikes on both sides further underscore the absence of de-escalation momentum. With roughly two months until October 31, these entrenched territorial disputes and frontline realities drive the market's strong consensus against a signed deal. A sudden shift in U.S. mediation pressure, major battlefield reversals, or external developments altering Russian incentives remain the primary variables that could still influence the timeline.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Ukraine signs any written instrument (e.g., treaty, ceasefire/armistice, framework/“roadmap,” exchange of letters, or mediated agreement text) that: (i) includes both Ukraine and the Russian Federation as parties, and (ii) either ends hostilities/establishes a ceasefire or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war (i.e., stated objective of peace/normalization plus principles, steps, and/or a timetable) by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: Aug 26, 2026, 5:43 PM ET
Volume
$286End Date
Nov 1, 2026Market Opened
Aug 26, 2026, 5:43 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Ukraine signs any written instrument (e.g., treaty, ceasefire/armistice, framework/“roadmap,” exchange of letters, or mediated agreement text) that: (i) includes both Ukraine and the Russian Federation as parties, and (ii) either ends hostilities/establishes a ceasefire or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war (i.e., stated objective of peace/normalization plus principles, steps, and/or a timetable) by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting. Ongoing Russian advances in eastern Ukraine, combined with Moscow's insistence on full control of the Donetsk region as a precondition for any ceasefire, have kept formal negotiations on a deep pause since early 2026. Kremlin statements confirm continued military operations while rejecting compromise proposals from Kyiv and Western mediators, and recent Ukrainian comments indicate only possible technical discussions ahead without expectations of rapid progress. Intensified strikes on both sides further underscore the absence of de-escalation momentum. With roughly two months until October 31, these entrenched territorial disputes and frontline realities drive the market's strong consensus against a signed deal. A sudden shift in U.S. mediation pressure, major battlefield reversals, or external developments altering Russian incentives remain the primary variables that could still influence the timeline.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Ukraine signs any written instrument (e.g., treaty, ceasefire/armistice, framework/“roadmap,” exchange of letters, or mediated agreement text) that: (i) includes both Ukraine and the Russian Federation as parties, and (ii) either ends hostilities/establishes a ceasefire or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war (i.e., stated objective of peace/normalization plus principles, steps, and/or a timetable) by October 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Only Ukraine’s signature is required; Russia’s signature or ratification is not.
Localized, temporary, or issue-specific arrangements—such as airstrike-limitation or deconfliction protocols, humanitarian pauses, evacuation corridors, prisoner-exchange or trade/export arrangements, border/DMZ adjustments, or ceasefires limited to a particular sector/front/municipality—will not qualify.
The document must bear a wet-ink or officially issued electronic signature of an authorized Ukrainian representative. Unsigned agreements (e.g., the 2023 Ohrid arrangement) will not qualify regardless of if they are otherwise officially enacted.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$286End Date
Nov 1, 2026Market Opened
Aug 26, 2026, 5:43 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Ongoing Russian advances in eastern Ukraine, combined with Moscow's insistence on full control of the Donetsk region as a precondition for any ceasefire, have kept formal negotiations on a deep pause since early 2026. Kremlin statements confirm continued military operations while rejecting compromise proposals from Kyiv and Western mediators, and recent Ukrainian comments indicate only possible technical discussions ahead without expectations of rapid progress. Intensified strikes on both sides further underscore the absence of de-escalation momentum. With roughly two months until October 31, these entrenched territorial disputes and frontline realities drive the market's strong consensus against a signed deal. A sudden shift in U.S. mediation pressure, major battlefield reversals, or external developments altering Russian incentives remain the primary variables that could still influence the timeline.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions