Michigan voters will decide Proposal 2026-01 on November 3, 2026, an automatically recurring ballot question under the 1963 Constitution that asks whether to convene a convention for general revision. Historical precedent shows consistent rejection—77 percent no in 1978, 72 percent in 1994, and 67 percent in 2010—reflecting voter preference for retaining the existing framework amid debates over term limits, redistricting, and fiscal policy. With the election three months away and no major organized campaigns or crises driving support for wholesale change, trader consensus reflects these base rates and institutional stability. Late developments such as unexpected polling shifts, high-profile endorsements, or a sudden governance crisis could still narrow the margin, though such shifts have not materialized in prior cycles.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedThis market will resolve to "Yes" if the Michigan Constitutional Convention Question passes according to Michigan electoral procedure. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
If the Michigan Constitutional Convention Question is removed from the 2026 midterm election ballot in Michigan, this market will resolve immediately to “No”.
If, for any reason, the results of this vote are not known by December 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No."
This market will resolve based on the results of the vote according to a consensus of credible reporting. In case of ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official results reported by the state of Michigan, specifically the Michigan Secretary of State (https://www.michigan.gov/sos).
Market Opened: Mar 2, 2026, 6:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if the Michigan Constitutional Convention Question passes according to Michigan electoral procedure. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
If the Michigan Constitutional Convention Question is removed from the 2026 midterm election ballot in Michigan, this market will resolve immediately to “No”.
If, for any reason, the results of this vote are not known by December 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No."
This market will resolve based on the results of the vote according to a consensus of credible reporting. In case of ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official results reported by the state of Michigan, specifically the Michigan Secretary of State (https://www.michigan.gov/sos).
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Michigan voters will decide Proposal 2026-01 on November 3, 2026, an automatically recurring ballot question under the 1963 Constitution that asks whether to convene a convention for general revision. Historical precedent shows consistent rejection—77 percent no in 1978, 72 percent in 1994, and 67 percent in 2010—reflecting voter preference for retaining the existing framework amid debates over term limits, redistricting, and fiscal policy. With the election three months away and no major organized campaigns or crises driving support for wholesale change, trader consensus reflects these base rates and institutional stability. Late developments such as unexpected polling shifts, high-profile endorsements, or a sudden governance crisis could still narrow the margin, though such shifts have not materialized in prior cycles.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions