EDward Gaming faced Ninjas in Pyjamas in the LPL 2026 Split 2 Knights Rivals best-of-five after splitting their prior head-to-head meetings one win apiece. NIP competed from the stronger Group Ascend but showed shaky late regular-season form, including losses to upper-division sides, while EDG posted consistent results against weaker Group Nirvana opponents and demonstrated late-game macro discipline. NIP’s early coordination and aggressive engages contrasted with EDG’s punish potential through players like Xiaohao in the jungle and Leave on bot lane. Roster continuity, recent map adaptations, and the extended series length highlighted how execution swings and objective control could shift outcomes in the matchup.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedEDward Gaming – Ninjas in Pyjamas




Series Lines
Moneyline
$149 Vol.
Game 2 Winner
$0 Vol.
Game Handicap
$0 Vol.
Total Games
$0 Vol.
Game 1
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 2
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 3
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 4
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 5
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
This market will resolve to "EDward Gaming" if EDward Gaming win the match against Ninjas in Pyjamas.
This market will resolve to "Ninjas in Pyjamas" if Ninjas in Pyjamas win the match against EDward Gaming.
If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 11, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of August 28, 2026 at 2:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins.
If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.
In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 12:10 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://gol.gg/esports/homeResolver
0x65070BE91...EDward Gaming – Ninjas in Pyjamas




Series Lines
Moneyline
$149 Vol.
Game 2 Winner
$0 Vol.
Game Handicap
$0 Vol.
Total Games
$0 Vol.
Game 1
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 2
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 3
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 4
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
Game 5
Odd/Even Total Kills
$0 Vol.
This market will resolve to "EDward Gaming" if EDward Gaming win the match against Ninjas in Pyjamas.
This market will resolve to "Ninjas in Pyjamas" if Ninjas in Pyjamas win the match against EDward Gaming.
If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 11, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of August 28, 2026 at 2:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins.
If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.
In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
Market Opened: Aug 23, 2026, 12:10 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://gol.gg/esports/homeResolver
0x65070BE91...EDward Gaming faced Ninjas in Pyjamas in the LPL 2026 Split 2 Knights Rivals best-of-five after splitting their prior head-to-head meetings one win apiece. NIP competed from the stronger Group Ascend but showed shaky late regular-season form, including losses to upper-division sides, while EDG posted consistent results against weaker Group Nirvana opponents and demonstrated late-game macro discipline. NIP’s early coordination and aggressive engages contrasted with EDG’s punish potential through players like Xiaohao in the jungle and Leave on bot lane. Roster continuity, recent map adaptations, and the extended series length highlighted how execution swings and objective control could shift outcomes in the matchup.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions