Martin Landaluce enters the US Open first-round matchup against Jacob Fearnley ranked around No. 65, with a career-high of No. 55 and prior Masters 1000 quarterfinal appearances in Miami and Rome during 2026. The 20-year-old Spaniard holds a stronger hard-court record this season, including wins over Jack Draper and Matteo Arnaldi in Cincinnati, though recent losses in Winston-Salem and Toronto highlight inconsistency. Fearnley, ranked near No. 100, arrives via successful US Open qualifying runs on hard courts and carries a higher career peak near No. 49, plus strong recent Challenger results. Both players lack extensive head-to-head history, making recent form, surface adaptation, and stamina on the outdoor hard courts the key variables shaping early trader consensus for the August 30 encounter.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedMartin Landaluce – Jacob Fearnley
Moneyline
$30 Vol.
This market will resolve to 'Martin Landaluce' if Martin Landaluce advances against Jacob Fearnley.
This market will resolve to 'Jacob Fearnley' if Jacob Fearnley advances against Martin Landaluce.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 13, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 28, 2026, 7:05 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/currentResolver
0x65070BE91...Martin Landaluce – Jacob Fearnley
Moneyline
$30 Vol.
This market will resolve to 'Martin Landaluce' if Martin Landaluce advances against Jacob Fearnley.
This market will resolve to 'Jacob Fearnley' if Jacob Fearnley advances against Martin Landaluce.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 13, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.
If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Aug 28, 2026, 7:05 PM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/currentResolver
0x65070BE91...Martin Landaluce enters the US Open first-round matchup against Jacob Fearnley ranked around No. 65, with a career-high of No. 55 and prior Masters 1000 quarterfinal appearances in Miami and Rome during 2026. The 20-year-old Spaniard holds a stronger hard-court record this season, including wins over Jack Draper and Matteo Arnaldi in Cincinnati, though recent losses in Winston-Salem and Toronto highlight inconsistency. Fearnley, ranked near No. 100, arrives via successful US Open qualifying runs on hard courts and carries a higher career peak near No. 49, plus strong recent Challenger results. Both players lack extensive head-to-head history, making recent form, surface adaptation, and stamina on the outdoor hard courts the key variables shaping early trader consensus for the August 30 encounter.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions
Build a combo
Select two options
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions